- Parabolic Arc
- June 1, 2023
Lucas, Babin Push Back Against NTSB Move to Expand Role into Commercial Space Accident Investigations
WASHINGTON (Frank Lucas/Brian Babin PR) — House Science, Space, and Technology Committee Ranking Member Frank Lucas joined Space and Aeronautics Subcommittee Ranking Member Brian Babin in a letter to the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) requesting information on their attempts to expand their role in commercial space accident investigations. Concurrently, Babin introduced a resolution to reiterate that commercial space launch is a developmental activity, rather than a mode of transportation.
NTSB issued a notice of proposed rulemaking this week to expand their role in commercial space accident investigations, a role currently carried out by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). Babin and Lucas wrote to express their concerns with this action and its consequences.
“NTSB’s attempts to expand its authority would alter the long-standing commercial space accident investigation process, and significantly impact the commercial space launch industry,” Babin and Lucas wrote. They noted that NTSB’s actions could negatively impact U.S. economic competitiveness, scientific discovery, space exploration, international cooperation, national security, and launch safety.
Along with the letter, Babin introduced a resolution yesterday declaring that space launch is a developmental activity, not a form of transportation, and that a process exists for investigating commercial space launch reentry activities.
The resolution details the extensive history of the House Science Committee’s jurisdiction over this matter, as well as prior conclusions that space launches cannot be considered routine flight, but rather fall in the realm of exploratory activities.
The letter to NTSB Chairwoman Jennifer Homendy and the resolution introduced by Babin are below.
November 18, 2021
The Honorable Jennifer L. Homendy
National Transportation Safety Board
490 L’Enfant Plaza, SW
Washington, DC 20594
Dear Ms. Homendy:
We write you to seek information regarding the National Transportation Safety Board’s (NTSB) recent Notice of Proposed Rule Making (NPRM) on Commercial Space Investigations.1 NTSB’s attempts to expand its authority would alter the long-standing commercial space accident investigation process and significantly impact the commercial space launch industry, U.S. economic competitiveness, scientific discovery, space exploration, international cooperation, national security, and safety. The expansion of authorities, alteration of processes and policies, and the codification of procedures require appropriate oversight, coordination, review, deliberation, and approval.
The House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology is committed to ensuring the continued growth and safety of the commercial space industry. Our Committee has a long history of legislation related to, and oversight of, space activities. Additionally, we have jurisdiction over “[o]uter space, including exploration and control thereof” (emphasis added).2 The Committee was established in response to the Soviet launch of Sputnik, and wrote not only the Space Act which established the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), but also the Commercial Space Launch Act that established commercial launch activities. Commercial space activities fall firmly within our jurisdiction, and our Space and Aeronautics Subcommittee has broad oversight over the following:
“All matters relating to astronautical and aeronautical research and development; national space policy, including access to space; suborbital access and applications; National Aeronautics and Space Administration and its contractor and government-operated labs; space commercialization, including commercial space activities relating to the Department of Transportation and the Department of Commerce; exploration and use of outer space; international space cooperation; the National Space Council; space applications, space communications and related matters; Earth remote sensing policy; civil aviation research, development, and demonstration; research, development, and demonstration programs of the Federal Aviation Administration; space law; other appropriate matters as referred by the Chair; and relevant oversight” (emphasis added).3
So that we can better understand NTSB’s attempts to expand its authorities and evaluate the impact this might have on the success and safety of U.S. commercial space activities, we are requesting the following information:
1) All documents and communications (as defined by attachment A) related to the development, drafting, and publishing of NTSB’s NPRM titled “Commercial Space Investigations” in the Federal Register on Tuesday, November 16, 2021.
2) All documents and communications related to the memorandum titled “SUBJECT: THE NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD’S AUTHORITY TO INVESTIGATE COMMERCIAL SPACE LAUNCH ACCIDENTS” dated July 1, 2015.
Please provide two copies of all documents and communications (one for the Majority and on for the Minority) by December 3, 2022. Please contact Mr. Tom Hammond of the Committee minority staff at 202-225-6371 with any questions related to this inquiry.
Thank you for your consideration of this matter. We are sure we share the same goals of ensuring safety and U.S. economic competitiveness and leadership in space. As the Board considers future actions related space investigations, please avail yourselves to the Committee and its staff. This would ensure that procedural measures such as the Congressional Review Act are not necessary.
Space and Aeronautics Subcommittee
2 Rules of the House of Representatives, One Hundred Seventeenth Congress, February 2, 2021; Rule X(1)(p). https://rules.house.gov/sites/democrats.rules.house.gov/files/117-House-Rules-Clerk.pdf
3 Rules of the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, U.S. House of Representatives, One Hundred Seventeenth Congress. Rule VI(b)(4). https://science.house.gov/imo/media/doc/117th%20Rules%20Final2.pdf
Introduced by Rep. Brian Babin
1ST SESSION H. RES. ll To declare that space launch is a developmental activity, not a form of transportation, and that a process exists for investigating commercial space launch reentry activities.
To declare that space launch is a developmental activity, not a form of transportation, and that a process exists for investigating commercial space launch reentry activities.
Whereas H.R. 3942, the Commercial Space Launch Act, was introduced in the House of Representatives on September 21, 1983, referred exclusively to the Committee on Science and Technology of the House of Representatives, and signed into law as Public Law 98–575 on September 30, 1984;
Whereas the Commercial Space Launch Act (Public Law 98–575) established the commercial space launch industry 35 years ago;
Whereas the Commercial Space Launch Act (Public Law 98–575) forms the basis of commercial space legislation and is codified as chapter 509 of title 51, United States Code;
Whereas chapter 509 of title 51, United States Code, establishes the licensing, experimental permit, and monitoring processes required for commercial space launch and reentry activities;
Whereas commercial space launch regulations are published in parts 400 through 460 of chapter III of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (as of the date of the adoption of this resolution);
Whereas commercial space launch licensees—
(1) are required by Federal statute and regulation to submit an accident investigation plan as part of a launch application and to submit to Federal Government observer access at licensee sites; and
(2) are, under such chapter 509, subject to modifications, prohibitions, preemptions, suspensions, and revocations of licenses and to administrative hearings, judicial review, and investigations and inquiries;
Whereas the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of the House of Representatives (in this resolution referred to as the ‘‘Committee’’), through both oversight and legislation, has, since the 1960s, been the lead entity in addressing the tragic loss of life related to catastrophic spaceflight accidents;
Whereas after a fire occurred in the Apollo 1 capsule during ground tests on January 7, 1967, which resulted in the deaths of Edward White, Gus Grissom, and Roger Chaffee, the Committee held a series of oversight hearings into the cause;
Whereas, as a result of these efforts, the Committee, in the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Authorization Act of 1968 (Public Law 90–67), required the establishment of the independent Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel, resulting in the first time Congress addressed issues relating to space accidents;
Whereas the Committee held extensive oversight hearings after the Space Shuttle Challenger and Space Shuttle Columbia accidents, and considered legislation related to space accident investigations that was referred exclusively to the Committee;
Whereas chapter 707 of title 51, United States Code, established the Human Space Flight Independent Investigation Commission, pursuant to provisions from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Authorization Act of 2005 (Public Law 109–155) and in response to the Space Shuttle Columbia accident;
Whereas the Columbia Accident Investigation Board (referred to in this resolution as the ‘‘Board’’) found ‘‘[I]t is unlikely that launching a space vehicle will ever be as routine an undertaking as commercial air travel—certainly not in the lifetime of anybody who reads this.’’;
Whereas the Board continued by reporting ‘‘Columbia’s failure to return home is a harsh reminder that the Space Shuttle is a developmental vehicle that operates not in routine flight but in the realm of dangerous exploration.’’;
Whereas the Board concluded, ‘‘[b]ecause of the dangers of ascent and re-entry, because of the hostility of the space environment, and because we are still relative newcomers to this realm, operation of the Shuttle and indeed all human spaceflight must be viewed as a developmental activity. It is still far from a routine, operational undertaking. Throughout the Columbia accident investigation, the Board has commented on the widespread but erroneous perception that the Space Shuttle as somehow comparable to civil or military air transport. They are not comparable; the inherent risks of spaceflight are vastly higher, and our experience level with spaceflight is vastly lower . . . . The Board urges NASA leadership, the architects of U.S. space policy, and the American people to adopt a realistic understanding of the risks and rewards of venturing into space.’’;
Whereas Rule X(1)(p) of the Rules of the House of Representatives for the 117th Congress, assigns the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology jurisdiction over ‘‘astronautical research and development, including resources, personnel, equipment, and facilities’’, ‘‘National Aeronautics and Space Administration’’, ‘‘National Space Council’’, and ‘‘Outer space, including exploration and control thereof’’; and
Whereas the Rules of the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of the House of Representatives for the 116th Congress state that the Subcommittee on Space and Aeronautics ‘‘Shall have jurisdiction over the following subject matter: all matters relating to astronautical and aeronautical research and development; national space policy, including access to space; sub-orbital access and applications; National Aeronautics and Space Administration and its contractors and government-operated labs; space commercialization, including commercial space activities related to the Department of Transportation and Department of Commerce; exploration and use of outer space; international space cooperation; the National Space Council; space applications, space communications and related matters; Earth remote sensing policy; civilian aviation research, development, and demonstration programs of the Federal Aviation Administration; space law; other appropriate matters referred by the Chair, and relevant oversight.’’: Now, therefore, be it
Resolved, That the House of Representatives—
(1) declares that space launch is a develop mental activity, not a form of transportation; and
(2) finds that a process exists for investigating commercial space launch and reentry activities.
4 responses to “Lucas, Babin Push Back Against NTSB Move to Expand Role into Commercial Space Accident Investigations”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
It sounds like a good old fashion turf war is developing in Congress over the regulation of space commerce.
That said I think it is good a procedure is being put into place for accident investigations and the NTSB is the logical agency to take the responsibility. But it sounds now that will only be the case after Hearings on held on it which House committee is the appropriate one to regulate it.
The dogs of the Senate and House are lifting their legs and marking their territories.
If we want space travel to become routine, it’s logical that the NTSB would be the body in charge of investigating accidents; it’s transportation, after all. As it has for aviation, the FAA will gradually build out a regulatory framework for testing, and already has, to some extent.
And as usual, our citizen congresscritters need to be gently brought up to speed on how government works and what agencies exist to do what.
It would also be useful for reflexive statists and self-aggrandizing bureaucrats to be perhaps not so gently brought up to speed on the fact that a simple desire to attach new provinces to an extant regulatory empire does not imply any actually useful contribution will be made thereby. Neither the NTSB nor the FAA can do even their current jobs without very considerable cooperation and assistance from makers and operators of transport vehicles. Dealing with space-related accidents will have at least the same degree of difficulty and dependence with all the baggage that comes with that.