Constellations, Launch, New Space and more…

Mitigating Lunar Dust: Masten Completes FAST Landing Pad Study

By Doug Messier
Parabolic Arc
September 29, 2021
Filed under , , , , , , , , ,
A spacecraft creates its own landing pad using the in-Flight Alumina Spray Technique system. (Credit: Masten Space Systems)

MOJAVE, Calif. (Masten Space Systems PR) — Landing on the Moon (and staying on the Moon) is no easy task. The lunar surface has limited sunlight, extremely cold temperatures, and lots and lots of dust (a.k.a. lunar regolith). But the good news is, Masten is up for the challenge!

We’re building the technologies and infrastructure to enable sustainable access and utilization of our solar system, starting with the Moon. Our goal is to accelerate ecosystems on the Moon, Mars, and beyond to unlock the value in space for humans on Earth. But first we have to solve for the challenging lunar environment, and one of the most pressing hurdles faced by the industry is mitigating lunar dust.

Why is lunar dust so hazardous?

Lunar dust is made up of tiny grains of crushed rock formed by meteorite impacts, effectively creating fragments of glass and mineral. This razor-sharp regolith has always been an issue (lunar dust tore the spacesuits of Apollo astronauts!), but the challenge is amplified for upcoming missions, such as Artemis. Why? Today’s lunar landers proposed for human missions are significantly larger and have more powerful engines.

Artemis landers will have a landed mass of approximately 20 to 60 metric tons compared to approximately 10 metric tons of landed mass during the Apollo era. Engine plumes from these larger landers will create a deep crater and kick up high-velocity regolith that can travel up to 3,000+ meters per second! This regolith can damage the lander, nearby infrastructure, orbital assets, and even endanger astronauts. It can also impact smaller lunar landers carrying important scientific instruments and payloads.

Landing on the moon with and without the in-Flight Alumina Spray Technique system. (Credit: Masten Space Systems)

The good news? Masten’s near-instant landing pads can help solve this challenge using an in-Flight Alumina Spray Technique (FAST). Following our Phase 1 NASA Innovative Advanced Concepts award, we’ve spent the last year studying and advancing the FAST concept in collaboration with Honeybee Robotics, Texas A&M University, and the University of Central Florida. And we just wrapped up our initial research, proving the solution is feasible in the lunar environment! You can find a summary of the report below.

But first… what exactly are FAST Landing Pads?

One approach to mitigate dust damage would require building a landing pad prior to each mission. This traditional approach would be both costly (we estimate more than $120 million per landing pad mission) and subject to a “chicken and egg” dilemma: how do you emplace the pad without landing something in the area first?

In contract, Masten’s FAST Landing Pad approach utilizes ceramic particles injected into rocket plume to form a coating over lunar regolith as a lander descends on the lunar surface. The particles impact the surface and solidify to build up a hard landing pad with greater thermal and ablation resistance.

This approach can significantly reduce deep cratering and prevent regolith ejecta from impacting the surrounding environment. That means spacecraft can safely land anywhere on the Moon without the need for a precursor pad construction mission.

The FAST Landing Pads can also maintain their structural integrity to minimize plume effects during an ascent back into lunar orbit.

Hot fire test using an alumina plate and Masten’s rocket engine test stand in Mojave, CA; engine camera (left), FLIR thermal camera (right). (Credit: Masten Space Systems)

What did we study in Phase I?

With our partners at Honeybee Robotics, Texas A&M University, and the University of Central Florida (including the renowned plume expert Dr. Phil Metzger!), we fine-tuned our approach during Phase I of the study, which included the following investigations.

  • Calculating the optimal landing pad thickness based on the plume effects and pad spalling (i.e., chips, flakes) using data from flying Masten’s vertical takeoff and vertical landing rockets.
  • Analyzing materials and particle sizes to ensure they’re the right temperature to adhere to each other on impact and build up layers of landing pad.
  • Modeling how the particles absorb and reject heat inside the engine and during travel to the surface.
  • Optimizing the deposition rate and required cooling time so the layers can harden into a solid pad while minimizing loiter time of the lander.
  • Modeling material adhesion to the regolith to optimize impact velocity and material selection.
  • Assessing performance of the solidified material and its effectiveness at mitigating blown dust and deep cratering effects.
  • Testing candidate materials with a hot fire rocket engine test that simulates a lunar landing.
Testing plume scouring effects with a lunar regolith simulant and Masten’s Xodiac rocket in Mojave, CA. (Credit: Masten Space Systems)

What did we learn from the study?

Our analysis determined the FAST concept is feasible for building near-instant landing pads during a lunar descent, even when utilizing an Artemis-scale human lander.

The exact landing pad thickness and material properties will be based on the size and temperature of the engine plume and can be optimized to meet a diverse set of missions.

How the in-Flight Alumina Spray Technique system works. (Credit: Masten Space Systems)

As an example, a large-scale Artemis human landing system would require alumina particles of approximately 0.5 millimeters diameter to pass through the engine without melting. The particles would impact the lunar surface at approximately 1,500 meters per second to create an initial base layer on the lunar surface that’s approximately 1 millimeter thick.

After the base layer is deposited, alumina particles of approximately 0.024 millimeters in diameter would be required to heat up and liquify as they pass through the engine. These particles would impact the surface at approximately 650 meters per second and create additional layers that build up and strengthen the landing pad. The full deployment would take 10 seconds to release 186 kilograms of alumina at up to 30 meters above the lunar surface, creating a 6-meter diameter landing pad. The pad would then require 2.5 seconds to cool before the vehicle touches down for a safe landing.

What’s next? To the Moon, Mars, and beyond!

In Phase I, we advanced the technology readiness and laid the groundwork for future development. In the next phase, our goal is to further mature the landing pad technology by testing it in a lunar environment. Looking even further ahead, the FAST concept can be applied to other planetary bodies like Mars where loose regolith also poses risks to human and robotic missions.

By mitigating plume effects on the Moon, Mars, and beyond, FAST Landing Pads can keep astronauts, infrastructure, and spacecraft safer while increasing the number of potential landing locations. This technology is also the key to significantly lower total program costs that would be required to build landing pad infrastructure.

In short, FAST Landing Pads can greatly expand accessibility and affordability to planetary bodies, unlocking new scientific discoveries and commercial applications.

3 responses to “Mitigating Lunar Dust: Masten Completes FAST Landing Pad Study”

  1. Lee says:

    This is a good idea. I wonder if they have tested the cooling time of a pad in a vacuum vs. air.

    It would also be nice of the person writing their press releases had done a bit of error checking and wasn’t so fond of exclamation points.

  2. therealdmt says:

    The FAST landing pad is an exciting technology. I’m definitely looking forward to NASA continuing to progress this, perhaps in time for an all-but-certainly delayed crewed landing.

    In particular, Musk said during his recent 3-part Everyday Astronaut interview that instead of building a special lunar lander version of Starship (one with extra motors up high), he hoped to convince NASA that a standard Starship could be used to land on the Moon without kicking up too much dust and rocks. Masten’s tech, if quickly developed, could possibly be a part of that.

    And it’s just sci-fi as heck 😀

  3. gunsandrockets says:

    Great story!

    FAST is a cool concept, but I think the lunar cratering problem is exaggerated. FAST looks more applicable to Mars cratering.

    The experience of Apollo lunar landers was no cratering, even though every landing left the engines on longer than the original plan of cutting off the engine when the contact probes touched the ground.

    My understanding is that the vacuum environment of the Moon tends to make the exhaust plume bloom out dramatically, reducing the focus of the jet on the ground. Mars on the other hand, might be a bigger problem because even its slight atmospheric pressure focuses the exhaust jet. As can be seen in the dramatic hole underneath the Chinese Mars lander…


    SLS delenda est

Leave a Reply