NSF to Decommission Arecibo Observatory’s 305-meter Telescope Due to Safety Concerns
ALEXANDRIA, Va. (NSF PR) — Following a review of engineering assessments that found damage to the Arecibo Observatory cannot be stabilized without risk to construction workers and staff at the facility, the U.S. National Science Foundation will begin plans to decommission the 305-meter telescope, which for 57 years has served as a world-class resource for radio astronomy, planetary, solar system and geospace research.
The decision comes after NSF evaluated multiple assessments by independent engineering companies that found the telescope structure is in danger of a catastrophic failure and its cables may no longer be capable of carrying the loads they were designed to support. Furthermore, several assessments stated that any attempts at repairs could put workers in potentially life-threatening danger. Even in the event of repairs going forward, engineers found that the structure would likely present long-term stability issues.
“NSF prioritizes the safety of workers, Arecibo Observatory’s staff and visitors, which makes this decision necessary, although unfortunate,” said NSF Director Sethuraman Panchanathan. “For nearly six decades, the Arecibo Observatory has served as a beacon for breakthrough science and what a partnership with a community can look like. While this is a profound change, we will be looking for ways to assist the scientific community and maintain that strong relationship with the people of Puerto Rico.”
Engineers have been examining the Arecibo Observatory 305-meter telescope since August, when one of its support cables detached. NSF authorized the University of Central Florida, which manages Arecibo, to take all reasonable steps and use available funds to address the situation while ensuring safety remained the highest priority. UCF acted quickly, and the evaluation process was following its expected timeline, considering the age of the facility, the complexity of the design and the potential risk to workers.
The engineering teams had designed and were ready to implement emergency structural stabilization of the auxiliary cable system. While the observatory was arranging for delivery of two replacement auxiliary cables, as well as two temporary cables, a main cable broke on the same tower Nov. 6. Based on the stresses on the second broken cable — which should have been well within its ability to function without breaking — engineers concluded that the remaining cables are likely weaker than originally projected.
“Leadership at Arecibo Observatory and UCF did a commendable job addressing this situation, acting quickly and pursuing every possible option to save this incredible instrument,” said Ralph Gaume, director of NSF’s Division of Astronomical Sciences. “Until these assessments came in, our question was not if the observatory should be repaired but how. But in the end, a preponderance of data showed that we simply could not do this safely. And that is a line we cannot cross.”
The scope of NSF’s decommissioning plan would focus only on the 305-meter telescope and is intended to safely preserve other parts of the observatory that could be damaged or destroyed in the event of an unplanned, catastrophic collapse. The plan aims to retain as much as possible of the remaining infrastructure of Arecibo Observatory, so that it remains available for future research and educational missions.
The decommissioning process involves developing a technical execution plan and ensuring compliance with a series of legal, environmental, safety and cultural requirements over the coming weeks. NSF has authorized a high-resolution photographic survey using drones, and is considering options for forensic evaluation of the broken cable — if such action could be done safely — to see if any new evidence could inform the ongoing plans. This work has already begun and will continue throughout the decommissioning planning. Equipment and other materials will be temporarily moved to buildings outside the danger zone. When all necessary preparations have been made, the telescope would be subject to a controlled disassembly.
After the telescope decommissioning, NSF would intend to restore operations at assets such as the Arecibo Observatory LIDAR facility — a valuable geospace research tool — as well as at the visitor center and offsite Culebra facility, which analyzes cloud cover and precipitation data. NSF would also seek to explore possibilities for expanding the educational capacities of the learning center. Safety precautions due to the COVID-19 pandemic will remain in place as appropriate.
Some Arecibo operations involving the analysis and cataloging of archived data collected by the telescope would continue. UCF secured enhanced cloud storage and analytics capabilities in 2019 through an agreement with Microsoft, and the observatory is working to migrate on-site data to servers outside of the affected area.
Areas of the observatory that could be affected by an uncontrolled collapse have been evacuated since the November cable break and will remain closed to unauthorized personnel during the decommissioning. NSF and UCF will work to minimize risk in the area in the event of an unexpected collapse. NSF has prioritized a swift, thorough process with the intent of avoiding such an event.
NSF recognizes the cultural and economic significance of Arecibo Observatory to Puerto Rico, and how the telescope serves as an inspiration for Puerto Ricans considering education and employment in STEM. NSF’s goal is to work with the Puerto Rican government and other stakeholders and partners to explore the possibility of applying resources from Arecibo Observatory for educational purposes.
“Over its lifetime, Arecibo Observatory has helped transform our understanding of the ionosphere, showing us how density, composition and other factors interact to shape this critical region where Earth’s atmosphere meets space,” said Michael Wiltberger, head of NSF’s Geospace Section. “While I am disappointed by the loss of investigative capabilities, I believe this process is a necessary step to preserve the research community’s ability to use Arecibo Observatory’s other assets and hopefully ensure that important work can continue at the facility.”
Engineering summary
Arecibo Observatory’s telescope consists of a radio dish 1,000 feet (305 meters) wide in diameter with a 900-ton instrument platform hanging 450 feet above. The platform is suspended by cables connected to three towers.
On Aug. 10, 2020, an auxiliary cable failed, slipping from its socket in one of the towers and leaving a 100-foot gash in the dish below. NSF authorized Arecibo Observatory to take all reasonable steps and use available funds, which amounted to millions of dollars, to secure the analysis and equipment needed to address the situation. Engineers were working to determine how to repair the damage and determine the integrity of the structure when a main cable connected to the same tower broke Nov. 6.
The second broken cable was unexpected — engineering assessments following the auxiliary cable failure indicated the structure was stable and the planning process to restore the telescope to operation was underway. Engineers subsequently found this 3-inch main cable snapped at about 60% of what should have been its minimum breaking strength during a period of calm weather, raising the possibility of other cables being weaker than expected.
Inspections of the other cables revealed new wire breaks on some of the main cables, which were original to the structure, and evidence of significant slippage at several sockets holding the remaining auxiliary cables, which were added during a refit in the 1990s that added weight to the instrument platform.
Thornton Tomasetti, the engineering firm of record hired by UCF to assess the structure, found that given the likelihood of another cable failing, repair work on the telescope — including mitigation measures to stabilize it for additional work — would be unsafe. Stress tests to capture a more accurate measure of the remaining cables’ strength could collapse the structure, Thornton Tomasetti found. The firm recommended a controlled demolition to eliminate the danger of an unexpected collapse.
“Although it saddens us to make this recommendation, we believe the structure should be demolished in a controlled way as soon as pragmatically possible, ” said the recommendation for action letter submitted by Thornton Tomasetti. “It is therefore our recommendation to expeditiously plan for decommissioning of the observatory and execute a controlled demolition of the telescope.”
UCF also hired two other engineering firms to provide assessments of the situation. One recommended immediate stabilization action. The other, after reviewing Thornton Tomasetti’s model, concurred that there is no course of action that could safely verify the structure’s stability and advised against allowing personnel on the telescope’s platforms or towers.
“Critical work remains to be done in the area of atmospheric sciences, planetary sciences, radio astronomy and radar astronomy,” UCF President Alexander N. Cartwright said. “UCF stands ready to utilize its experience with the observatory to join other stakeholders in pursuing the kind of commitment and funding needed to continue and build on Arecibo’s contributions to science.”
After receiving the contracted assessments, NSF brought in an independent engineering firm and the Army Corps of Engineers to review the findings. The firm NSF hired concurred with the recommendations of Thornton Tomasetti and expressed concern about significant danger from uncontrolled collapse. The Army Corps of Engineers recommended gathering additional photographic evidence of the facility and a complete forensic evaluation of the broken cable.
Given the fact that any stabilization or repair scenario would require workers to be on or near the telescope structure, the degree of uncertainty about the cables’ strength and the extreme forces at work, NSF accepted the recommendation to prepare for controlled decommissioning of the 305-meter telescope.
11 responses to “NSF to Decommission Arecibo Observatory’s 305-meter Telescope Due to Safety Concerns”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Another technology pioneered by the Americans ceded to China for the simple fact that Americans have lost the appetite to maintain let alone build new infrastructure. Give it a few years and much of the radio transmitters, receiver instruments and people will find their way to the Chinese scope as P.I. instruments and guest researchers.
Pioneered six decades ago. And largely rendered obsolete long since by terrestrial arrays of smaller steerable scopes. The place to put a single-reflector radiotelescope Arecibo-size or larger is pretty clearly in space. The NRO has been putting up ELINT birds with collector antennas a significant fraction the size of Arecibo for decades now.
If Arecibo instruments and researchers wind up in China, fine. The U.S. scientific establishment seems to have spent its Arecibo-related funds almost exclusively on instruments and researchers while criminally neglecting physical infrastructure maintenance. The Chinese government, for its part, spent a lot on new physical infrastructure without much apparent consideration of who was going to staff their shiny new MegaWok. Neatly dovetailed governmental stupidities. It’s a perfect match.
Aperture and transmission power matter. There’s a reason why Aracebo is the transmitter and Goldstone the receiver in interplanetary and near Earth imaging radar. It’s a real loss. Your nonchalance at losing a basic technological capability and ceding it to the rest of the world is just the attitude that has the US in decline. You don’t let a capability like that go without replacing it.
Your example of the Chinese system being a bit of a farce because they had not planned for the staff to make the system viable is spot on. It shows how the Chinese system can’t build a society without outside help. But as the Aracebo crowd moves to China, those people will fill in the gaps of the Chinese system, and save them from their own shortcomings. Meanwhile after 5 to 10 years the Chinese will be completely proficient in ultra large aperture radio telescope operations, and we will have lost the ability and the people who knew how to do it, because of a lack of hardware. You and I argue about this a lot, this is a perfect example of how we save the Chinese system from collapsing in on itself.
As its radio telescopy abilities were no longer cutting-edge, this Arecibo decision seems have turned entirely on how important its radar abilities were relative to what it would cost to fix or replace it. NSF seems to have decided the value fell well short of the cost.
Given that NSF is also the agency that’s been pennypinching Arecibo’s maintenance for decades, that opinion is far from unquestionable, but the real question seems to me to be one of alternatives.
For jobs like radar mapping of sizable celestial bodies, it seems that radar orbiters would be both more accurate and have much higher duty cycles. There are already private firms building relatively inexpensive synthetic aperture radar sats to image Earth from LEO. Some sats like that launched on Falcon Heavies could comprehensively image, say, Venus, for rather less than it would likely cost to replace Arecibo. Comparable alternatives, also with rapidly falling costs, could likely do a better and cheaper job of radar mapping whatever else Arecibo was being used for.
Arecibo was built 60 years ago. 60 years before that, in 1900, steam locomotives were a vital part of the U.S. long-haul transport infrastructure. By the time Arecibo was young, steam locomotives were all in museums. Radio astronomy and space-based radar have both come a long way in the intervening 60 years. If the Chinese still want to build their big “steam locomotive” as a prestige project, I say let them. We can add it to all those ghost cities the Chinese ran up and which are now crumbling as monuments to the human folly that is socialist central planning.
You’re missing all the points. Cutting edge is not the end all be all. An operating and competent society actually practices all levels of technological development. We still make and operate steam trains, heck we still have professional flint nappers. You need it all. Yes NSF dropped the ball. We agree on that.
“For jobs like radar mapping of sizable celestial bodies, it seems that radar orbiters would be both more accurate and have much higher duty cycles”. Yes, but that’s not what interplanetary radar is used for. It’s used for radar pinging small celestial bodies. Look at Earth as a combat aircraft defending itself from potential impactors. Like any combat aircraft it needs sensors to detect and track targets. Radar is a important part of that sensor suite. In fact, while it’s not great at surveys it’s priceless for propagating orbits. We just let our biggest emitter go defunct with no plans to reconstitute the capability.
And of course, the Chinese are collapsing …. No they’re not, because our business sector keeps propping them up and filling in the gaps that their system creates.
The radio astro types can’t catch a break. First the 300 foot at Green Bank collapsed, now this. Makes you wonder who they are hiring for “engineering”.
What’s left of NSF and other basic research funding organizations refuse to pay for upkeep. The feds prefer to further one or two large projects leaving the base facilities to pay for themselves.They expect the states and other funding agencies to fill the gap. State agencies mimic their federal counterparts and put limits on infrastructure as well preferring to pay for people. One of my telescopes is over 100 years old, and it’s still a useful instrument. So there are examples of people keeping old instruments viable, but you do need to pump money into real hardware still.
as the Empire collapses. the cables were not as strong as we thought…bad maintenance
I didn’t see any estimates for the cost of replacement. Any guesses?
Congress decided to build a new Green Bank telescope and they put up the money. I wonder if they will rebuild this one. They might be able to lower the instrument platform they said, and reuse it. Other parts might be salvageable. The control room, computers etc. The towers may be reusable if they have maintained them. I think they just need to replace the cables.
One can’t “just replace the cables.” The instrument platform can’t be saved because of the decrepit condition of the remaining cables. It can’t even be scrapped safely without just dropping it and further damaging the reflector dish. The whole thing is now a write-off.
Congress rebuilt Green Bank because the prior version that collapsed was located in West Virginia and that state’s all-time Pork King Robert Byrd was still alive and in the Senate at the time. That’s why the bigger, better Green Bank scope is now named after him. Puerto Rico isn’t even a state and certainly has no comparable political figure willing to push for an Arecibo 2.0.
It’s dead, Jim.