XCOR Lost ULA Engine Contract
Despite laying off its 21 remaining employees, XCOR Aerospace isn’t dead yet. But, it’s not in real good shape, either.
It turns out that a major blow to the company was the loss of a contract with United Launch Alliance (ULA) to develop an upper stage for the Vulcan booster.
The primary impetus for the layoffs, Acting CEO and XCOR Board member Michael Blum told me, is the loss of a contract for engine development that the company had with United Launch Alliance. “The proceeds should have been enough to fund the prototype of Lynx [the company’s planned spacecraft], but ULA decided they’re not going to continue funding the contract. So we find ourselves in a difficult financial situation where we need to raise money or find joint developments to continue.” ULA declined to comment.
Blum is quick to add, though, that the company is still a going concern. “Committed, early investors of the company are making resources available to have a core team on a contract basis to see through business development, joint venture, and fundraising opportunities.”
Blum says that XCOR has two basic lines of business – building rocket engines and components, and the development of its Lynx spacecraft. “Most of the interest I’m seeing right now is in the Lynx project,” he says.
The engine development work was part of ULA’s ACES upper stage, which will replace the current Centaur. Blue Origin and Aerojet Rocketdyne are also competing to develop engines to power the reusable stage.
XCOR Acting CEO Michael Blum said the company laid off 11 employees in Mojave, Calif., and 10 employees in Midland, Texas. Some of the laid off workers will be hired back on a contract basis while the company explores options.
Last week’s layoffs were the second major round of staff cuts for the struggling space company. XCOR laid off about half its staff — including many employees working on the suborbital Lynx spacecraft — back in May 2016 for financial reasons.
Down in the heart of the West Texas oil country, officials in Midland are evaluating where the most recent layoffs leave them. Midland and XCOR signed a $10 million deal in 2012 for the company to relocate from Mojave to the Texas city, a move that was never completed.
XCOR Aerospace thus far has met its obligations as required by the economic development agreement signed nearly five years ago with the Midland Development Corp. and has collected $9 million in performance incentives, relocation payments and renovations. Still, the space industry company faces payroll, capital investment and rent obligations that officials said will be a challenge considering its financial status.
The economic development agreement with MDC shows XCOR must meet obligations of $8 million in total salaries and wages this year and $12 million next year….
The contract with the MDC says should the company (XCOR) fail to pay the recapture payment within 30 days of MDC written notice or notify the MDC that they cannot make the recapture payment, the company shall be considered in default, unless alternative arrangements have been made.
An XCOR timeline provided by the MDC shows the last of the incentive payments made to XCOR took place in September 2014 and that the company has met the terms of the contract in the following areas — job creation, total annual compensation, capital assets and cumulative investment in capital assets. The company even met those requirements in 2016 as the contract allowed for previous year salary amounts above requirements to be rolled over. To meet compensation requirements in 2016, more than $3.7 million was rolled over from 2014 and 2015.
XCOR’s financial problems are a blow to Midland’s effort to diversify its economy away from the boom-and-bust oil and gas industry that dominates the Permian Basin.
12 responses to “XCOR Lost ULA Engine Contract”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
It’s hard when your one big customer cancels their contract.
It is an absolute failure of the C-level of any company to be entirely reliant on one contract.
Sigh. I hate this. Somebody throw these guys a bone.
I am sure they are looking for any sort of investor right now… Call and see if they’ll take your 401K or your kid’s college fund as investment. Time to make some big space bucks. LOL
Where’s Paul Allen when you need him? He loves throwing his money away. At least this would be some engine tech to go along with his GIANT rocket-less bird. I think the writing was on the wall when Greason left. Too bad. The lynx does seem like it’d be pretty awesome.
Nope, writing was on the wall when Greason was there. Why you think he’s forced out by the company? He wasted all the money.
I think he means Chief, as in CEO, CTO, COO, etc. In other words, the entire executive team.
After Blue lost their most recent hardware, I think ULA is waiting for some more positive results before proceeding.
I’m beginning to think Vulcan may never happen??
Why do you think that? There are still two domestic hydrolox engine suppliers, and they are not even beginning work on ACES until the 2020’s.
Yes but they’d be waiting on the cheaper 3d printed version of the RL-10 that’s in development. So we are gonna see some relativly fresh hardware either way.
Hmmm, that’s an interesting thought experiment. It started development in the 50s, so it has the benefit of age. While it’s not in the same class, R-4Ds have been in use since Apollo. Because each vehicle uses several, there are probably more of those individually. The LR-79 is probably the most prolific American main engine, Navaho to Atlas to Thor, Saturn I and Delta.
But in the end, anything used on the R-7 is probably the overall champion. It’s just hard to beat a rocket that has launched over 1000 times!