Constellations, Launch, New Space and more…
News

China Debuts New Long March 6 Booster

By Doug Messier
Parabolic Arc
September 19, 2015
Filed under ,

CNSA_logoChina successfully launched its new Long March 6 rocket from the Taiyuan Satellite Launch Center on Sunday, with the booster placing 20 small satellites into orbit.

Long March 6 is a three-stage small satellite launcher capable of placing up to 1,080 kg (2,381 lb) into a sun-synchronous orbit of 700 km (435 miles). It is 29.2 meters (96 feet) tall.

The first stage is powered by a single YF-100 engine that burns kerosene RP-1 and liquid oxygen (LOX). The same motor is being used in the first stage of the larger Long March 5 booster, which will debut next year.

Long March 6’s second stage uses a single YF-115 engine powered by kerosene RP-1 and kerosene. Its third stage has four YF-85 motor powered by hydrogen peroxide and kerosene.

8 responses to “China Debuts New Long March 6 Booster”

  1. Christopher James Huff says:
    0
    0

    “Long March 6’s second stage uses a single YF-115 engine powered by kerosene RP-1 and kerosene.”

    I think you’re going to need an oxidizer in there somewhere.

    The third stage uses hydrogen peroxide? That’s a weird choice. Might be worth the trouble if they’re keeping the third stage active for extended periods of time, but why would they do that in a low-orbit smallsat launcher?

    • ArcadeEngineer says:
      0
      0

      The developer of CZ-6, SAST, is also working on a LOX/H2O2 space tug called TY-1. My guess is they used the same basic design to reduce development costs, but I haven’t seen enough on the third stage to know for sure.

    • stoffer says:
      0
      0

      I think their idea was to simplify processing on the ground and they wanted some non-toxic hypergolic equivalent. H2O2 works fine. It is somewhat corrosive but nobody would want to have LOX spilled on them either.

      • Christopher James Huff says:
        0
        0

        I’d much rather have LOX spilled on me. High test hydrogen peroxide will cause burns in seconds and has high potential for spontaneously igniting. LOX will just splash off skin. It’s a problem if it wets clothing, but hydrogen peroxide will wet clothing more readily. And a LOX spill will evaporate far more quickly and without the risk of leaving hazardous explosive compounds behind.

        Lots of people seem to try using hydrogen peroxide to simplify things. A bit like nitrous oxide, it never seems to work out that way.

  2. Jeff Smith says:
    0
    0

    Long live the tradition of building a small rocket to test parts of the eventual big rocket!

    Saturn I became the Saturn V, Falcon 1 became Falcon 9, Delta III became Delta IV (that wasn’t intentional, but it happened), and now LM-6 will become the LM-5.

  3. jjimrussels says:
    0
    0

    Annnnddd this is why the Chinese are beating us. Hate to admit it, but I don’t see the USA getting back on track until TRUMP reaches the Whitehouse in 2016. We’ll see about China’s “rocket” when that happens.

Leave a Reply