Constellations, Launch, New Space and more…

CSF: SpaceShipTwo Provides Valuable Lessons Learned

By Doug Messier
Parabolic Arc
July 28, 2015
Filed under , , , , , , ,
The spot where SpaceShipTwo's cockpit crashed. (Credit: Douglas Messier)

The spot where SpaceShipTwo’s cockpit crashed. (Credit: Douglas Messier)

WASHINGTON, DC (CSF PR) — Today the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) held a public hearing to adjudicate the probable cause of last year’s SpaceShipTwo test flight accident, which resulted in an in-flight breakup. NTSB’s investigators and analysts presented their findings, conclusions, and recommendations in a draft report to the NTSB Board members. Throughout the discussion, NTSB staff and Board members praised the industry’s strong commitment to transparency and cooperation during the investigation, which helped lead to a more timely and complete resolution of the accident investigation.

“We cannot undo the unfortunate events that transpired last October,” said CSF President Eric Stallmer, “but we will successfully apply, and in some cases have already applied, the lessons learned to make our entire industry better and safer as a result.”

“CSF welcomes the NTSB’s report, and we pledge our support to promptly carrying out the recommendations given to us by the Board. We also pledge to continue to work with the Congress to ensure FAA AST has the resources necessary to fully address the safety findings and recommendations in the report.”


NTSB’s draft report put forth ten recommendations directed at both the commercial space industry and FAA AST to improve processes, communication, and collaboration within and between one another. Importantly, none of the recommendations include calls for new regulations or additional government regulatory authority.

The NTSB proposes that the Secretary of Transportation utilize his current authority to improve safety through more collaboration with industry. The NTSB’s draft report reaffirms the integrity of the regulatory framework that currently underpins the commercial spaceflight industry. It adds additional credence to the bipartisan effort in Congress to extend the current framework before key provisions expire in September.

NTSB also issued two specific recommendations for CSF as the lead trade association in the industry dedicated to pursuing the highest levels of safety:

1) Advise commercial spaceflight operators to work with local emergency response partners to revise emergency response procedures for planning to ensure that helicopter and other resources are appropriately deployed during flights; and

2) Collaborate with FAA AST to develop and issue human factor guidance for operators to use throughout the design and operation of a vehicle. The guidance should address but not be limited to the human factor issues identified during the SpaceShipTwo accident investigation.

The NTSB Board voted to modify the staff’s draft findings and recommendations and approve them in revised form. The finalized report is expected to be published in the next two to four weeks.

“In his conclusion today, NTSB Chairman Hart reminded us that ‘anybody’s accident is everybody’s accident…when it comes to safety, industry must cooperate and collaborate with each other and with the FAA.’ That partnership among competitors and the government is why the CSF exists; an important dynamic NTSB recognized in issuing two of its recommendations to us today,” Stallmer concluded.

One response to “CSF: SpaceShipTwo Provides Valuable Lessons Learned”

  1. Jacob Samorodin says:

    Yep. Lessons (tragic lessons) were learned. Otherwise? A human life was wasted for nothing. I believe that deceased crewman joins the ranks of 14 Shuttle crew, 3 Apollo 1 astronauts and 4 Soyuz cosmonauts who paid with their lives to advance space travel. If the loss of life, however tragic, for space projects is too much and not worth it then let us put an end to all human spaceflight forever.
    Also: are Virgin Galactic spacecraft worth it?
    Are they too dangerous? If so, compared to what? Compared to New Shepard? Compared to Soyuz? Compared to the Lynx-1 spacecraft? Oooops, I called Lynx-1 a spacecraft and it isn’t even going to approach the Karman Line.
    Are VG winged spacecraft taking too long to build and to eventually test, etc?
    Yeah! Are lengthy delays abnormal to space projects or spaceflight?
    Listen! I want to be a space tourist without forking out 20-30 million dollars and learning Russian and living in Russia for months. OK! So VG winged aerospace craft may fall short of the Karman Line or 50 miles altitude. But you know what? I would be GLAD to pay 200,000 dollars to see the Earth from 40 miles up and experience a couple of minutes of zero-g. I don’t know about you.

Leave a Reply