Space Access: Henry Spencer on Affordable Spaceflight Beyond LEO
Henry Spencer
“Affordable Spaceflight Beyond LEO: Alternative Approaches, Paths Not Taken”
If you look at destination points beyond LEO, the moon is the obvious destination…
- Relatively close
- Interesting place to explore
- Resources available
L1 and L2 points
- a bit further away, longer travel time
- Other than satellite maintence and refueling, not much interest in these regions
Mars
- Much further away
- Phobos and Deimos are closer to LEO in terms of Delta V than the moon
- But, it takes longer and your return windows are longer due to orbit
Asteroids
- Rendezvous with an asteroid, spend some time there, then jump off as it gets near Earth
- Can do human missions with relative easy adapations of hardware
- Suitable asteroids – one every year or two
Issues with Asteroid Missions
- Patience
- Radiation from cosmic rays and potentially fatal solar flares – need a storm shelter area
- Large crew quarters – inflatable habitats might solve the problem
- Tougher heat shield
- Liquid hydrogen fuel – boil off issues
Lunar Missions
- LEO refeuling capability
- Not many changes required for moon vs. deep space
- Colder environment
- Continuous sunlight mostly
- Shadows can last longer
- Radiation issues – mostly with van Allen belt passage
- Solar flares
- Communications and navigational issues – detailed changes
Best Approaches
- Long-terrm viewpoint focused on transportation services, multiple destinations and understanding methods and destinations will change
- Focus on Mars could lead to a tightly focused, dead-end program that goes to the most interesting place possible before political support dies
- Focus on affordable operations costs so you can fly over and over again
- Evolutionary approach focused on technology that can be adapated for many missions – not revolutionary giant leap
- If you’re focused on orbital assembly, then heavy lift doesn’t make a lot of sense
Earth to Orbit Issues
- Base in LEO
- Resonant orbits for first-orbit rendezvous
- Tugs for altitude matching
- Expendable tether as an upper stage and for de-orbiting the vehicle
Orbital Assembly
- Decouples launch from departure
- No weight growth problems
- No follow-on mission problems
- Using more launches is good
- Requires semi-storage fuels – may not be able to use liquid hydrogen
- Trade-off of additional launches for lower development costs
Moon Exploration Issues
- High Delta V requirement
- No atmosphere to help with descent
- Critical navigation and piloting – time critical
- Reusable vehicles – don’t want to throw away the spacecraft every time
- No easy place to put an orbital base – low lunar orbits not stable
- Lunar Lagrange point is a bit distant – awkward for lunar operations
Lunar Surface Operations
- Lunar surface is difficult environment
- Engineers overly optimistic about extracting resources from the soil
- Equipment and processes will need debugging

Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.