Crowded Skies: Embry-Riddle Studies Financial Impacts of Space Launches on Aviation

A SpaceX Falcon Heavy begins its first flight. (Credit: NASA)

DAYTONA BEACH, Fla., July 13, 2018 (ERAU PR) — Researchers with Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University’s College of Business in Daytona Beach, Florida, are calculating the specific financial impacts of space launches on aviation.

Rodrigo Firmo, a graduate research assistant and M.B.A. candidate, recently presented preliminary results of the project at an international conference at ESTACA University in France.

The work of Mr. Firmo and the team further confirms a report released last month by the Air Line Pilots Association, which suggested that airline and airport operations will be negatively impacted until space launch and return activities are fully integrated with the National Airspace.

“While government launch activities have always impacted airline operations,” Firmo pointed out, “we now have commercial space company operations impacting commercial airline operations.”

Heavy Impacts

On Feb. 6, 2018, the SpaceX Falcon Heavy – the most powerful operational rocket in the world – streaked across a brilliant blue sky, triggering wild applause from spectators lucky enough to witness America’s latest aerospace achievement. When Falcon Heavy’s two side boosters successfully returned to Earth, thus proving the potential of reusable boosters, onlookers screamed with joy.

Such breakthroughs inspire researchers, entrepreneurs and young people to push the limits of human capability ever higher, Firmo noted. Yet, every launch takes a financial toll on airlines, and at the dawn of a New Space Age, those impacts are bound to keep rising.

The Embry-Riddle research – directed by faculty members Janet Tinoco and Chunyan Yu with Carlos Castro and colleagues at the Next-Generation Embry Riddle Advanced Research (NEAR) Lab – looked at two scenarios: a launch by Virgin Galactic from the Cecil Spaceport in Jacksonville, Florida, and an Atlas launch at Cape Canaveral. Virgin Galactic’s SpaceShip Two takes off horizontally, whereas Atlas rockets launch vertically, so they affect the National Airspace in different ways.

As a first step, the team captured a real-world snapshot of the National Airspace over both study locations on a particular day: May 2, 2017. They leveraged special fast-time simulation software – the Jeppesen Total Airspace and Airport Modeller (TAAM).

“We established a baseline, which was a standard day of air traffic,” Firmo explained. “Then we simulated it again, but we blocked the airspace for a certain amount of time to see what would happen to flights, based on how the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) handles launches.”

For their simulation, the team assumed two hours before and two hours after a launch, the FAA closes the airspace around the spaceport (although this time as well as launch vehicles vary, so results vary). “Airline flights get delayed and rerouted,” Firmo noted. “Aircraft spend extra time in the air, increasing fuel costs.”

High Costs

Quantifying those costs proved astonishing. “For extra fuel alone, when we ran simulations for Cecil Spaceport and Cape Canaveral, the cost was between $10,000 and $30,000 per launch that airlines cumulatively pay for extra fuel in each of those two locations, every time a space launch closes the airspace,” Firmo said, assuming a fuel cost of $1.51 per gallon. This is a best-case scenario. “Although these results are preliminary, they provide a starting point in determining potential impacts to the airlines.”

Based on the current simulation scenarios, by 2027, extra fuel costs could rise to $200,000 per launch, and by 2037, the price tag to airlines could be a whopping $300,000, he said. These numbers reflect the forecasted increase in aviation traffic in 10 and 20 years, respectively. Further, time delays due to launch significantly increase the cost impacts to the airlines and airports, Embry-Riddle reported.

The Air Line Pilots Association (ALPA) reported in June that the Falcon Heavy launch on Feb. 6 delayed 563 airline flights, resulting in 62 extra miles added to flights across the southeastern United States.

In a Bloomberg News article, ALPA President Tim Canoll said that real-time rocket location data could be fed into air traffic control systems to reduce the amount of time that airspace must be blocked for each space launch. The challenges of integrating space launches with aviation was discussed at a recent hearing of a U.S. House of Representatives Transportation and Infrastructure subcommittee.

  • WhoAmI

    I wonder if there are any FAA restrictions imposed on where space ports can be. Then, they should do another study on how much it costs launchers to ship their rockets to unique locations to avoid launching in heavily congested airspace (i.e. rockets being rerouted due to airline traffic).

  • Tom Billings

    “In a Bloomberg News article, ALPA President Tim Canoll said that
    real-time rocket location data could be fed into air traffic control
    systems to reduce the amount of time that airspace must be blocked for
    each space launch.”

    This is the high-end equivalent of where we begin to replace the current human-operated system for air traffic control with one in which automated vehicles negotiate with each other the rights of way. FAA is already resisting this from the low-end, in its resistance to un-piloted drone aircraft.

  • ThomasLMatula

    Sounds to me that someone is looking for a job with either the FAA or Airline Pilots Association. In terms of the study it sounds like the classic example of deciding what results you want and using your inputs to achieve those outputs. Instead of only two cases they should have used them to produce dozens, then match them against typical delays caused by weather and other activities.

  • Emmet Ford

    I wonder if there are any FAA restrictions imposed on where space ports can be.

    They are probably not allowed to overlap. No one wants to look too silly, after all. Other than that, since they never launch anything, it doesn’t really matter.

    Cecil Field is inside the bustling metropolis of Jacksonville, which contrasts rather starkly with the location of Spaceport America, twenty miles or so removed from downtown Truth or Consequences. But to be fair, Jacksonville is the largest city in the country, geographically, and in aerial photos the airport’s immediate surroundings look fairly rural.

    In lieu of an actual answer to your query, here is a link to the FAA’s space port regulations, such as they are: https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=b2f16306126cc71fdd0e0f29be92048d&mc=true&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title14/14cfr420_main_02.tpl. Basically, no firing off rockets directly above primary schools during recess.

  • redneck

    You’re saying that during recess they have a chance to run?